Union Minister Kiren Rijiju recently made a bold statement in Parliament. He accused the previous UPA government of allowing public properties to be labeled as Waqf land without proper oversight. Consequently, his remarks have sparked a political debate, especially as the government pushes for changes in Waqf property management.
What Did Kiren Rijiju Say?
While discussing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, Rijiju highlighted instances where public and historic properties were allegedly classified as Waqf land. Specifically, he pointed out two key cases:
- Tamil Nadu’s Tiruchirapalli district: Authorities reportedly marked a centuries-old temple and the surrounding village as Waqf property.
- Surat Municipal Corporation: The municipal headquarters was allegedly listed as Waqf land.
As a result, he warned that if such claims had gone unchecked, even the Indian Parliament could have been declared as Waqf property. Rijiju blamed the UPA for failing to regulate these claims, leading to unauthorized land acquisitions.
Key Features of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 seeks to modernize the Waqf Act of 1995. Notably, the proposed changes aim to improve transparency and accountability in Waqf property management. Here are the key updates:
✅ New Name for the Act – The bill proposes renaming it as the Unified Waqf Management and Development Act.
✅ Digital Registration System – A centralized online portal will help register Waqf properties and prevent disputes.
✅ Defined Powers for Waqf Boards – The bill sets clear boundaries for Waqf Boards, ensuring lawful operations.
✅ Strict Encroachment Rules – New provisions will help remove illegal land occupations and resolve disputes efficiently.
Therefore, Rijiju emphasized that the bill will ensure fair management of Waqf properties while protecting the rights of all communities, including marginalized groups.
Why is the Opposition Objecting?
Opposition parties, particularly Congress, have strongly opposed the bill, calling it unnecessary and controversial. Their main concerns include:
❌ Interference in Religious Matters – Critics argue that the bill weakens the autonomy of Waqf institutions.
❌ Appointment of Non-Muslims in Waqf Governance – Some leaders fear this move could disrupt traditional Waqf property management.
❌ Possible Political Motivations – Opponents claim raising the issue of Waqf land is a strategy to influence public opinion before elections.
Government’s Response
Kiren Rijiju defended the bill, explaining that it follows recommendations from past committees, including the Sachar Committee formed during the UPA government. Furthermore, he stressed that the amendments do not target any religious group but aim to ensure proper governance of Waqf properties.
Additionally, he cited a Supreme Court ruling stating that Waqf Boards must function within legal limits and are subject to regulation.
Conclusion
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has triggered intense debate. On one hand, the government claims it will improve transparency and stop the misuse of land. On the other hand, the opposition argues that it interferes with religious institutions.
As discussions continue, the impact of these proposed changes on Waqf property management in India remains uncertain. What are your thoughts on this issue? Share your views in the comments!
stay here for more updates :- marketdarpan.com
